Perhaps after reversing this Politifact review the newspaper will take the opportunity to look back at some of the other “Politifacts” to test their accuracy. Some of them, written about candidates on both sides of the aisle, were just awful examples of bias. (The Politifacts on Charlie Sykes and Jim Sullivan spring to mind.)PolitiFact's penchant for stuffing failed stories down the memory hole represents a disturbing trend for an outfit that is already stingy with its transparency. In the midst of 2010 PolitiFact revised a flawed story but kept the old version archived. That seems better in terms of transparency. Was it a change of policy or the same old chaos we're accustomed to seeing from PolitiFact?
Do stop by Wigderson's Library and Pub to savor the entire (brief) post.