PolitiFact does not advertise the fact that it applies standards inconsistently.
But it could do so without misleading people.
President Biden passed correlation off as causation. "Mostly True," said PolitiFact: Because, you know, the correlation was there.
A key study backs Biden up. But the reality is millions of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines remained in circulation during the ban, and that makes it hard to tease out the law’s impact.
We rate this claim Mostly True.
Of course it's child's play to come up with an example where somebody factually claimed a correlation and got PolitiDinged for it.
The Facebook post did not directly claim causation any more than did President Biden.
PolitiFact confirmed the claimed correlation, but guess what? There was no proof the higher mask usage caused the deaths! So, "False."
A Facebook post said there’s a "‘positive correlation’ between higher mask usage and COVID-19 deaths."
The post was referencing a study that reviewed data from 35 European countries and found that in places where mask usage was higher, COVID-19 deaths were also higher. But the study’s author said there was no cause-and-effect found.
Critics of the study said masking protocols were issued in response to high rates of transmission. So it would be expected that deaths would occur while masking would be in place.
Public health officials recommend masking as one way to help reduce transmission..
We rate this claim False.
Parallel cases. Both claims asserted a correlation. In both cases PolitiFact substantially confirmed the correlation but noted that correlation does not prove causation. Nearly polar opposite ratings resulted.
That's how PolitiFact rolls.